Book review notice and question
Sep. 26th, 2005 03:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
My review of Devil's Bargain is up on Reviewing the Evidence. I'm going to miss the next round of Once Written because I didn't read the books as soon as they arrived and thus will miss deadline. Planning on reading next week and getting into next ish, at the end of October.
I've been trying to make up my mind if I'm going to review the book I just read. I read it with that in mind, and RtE would take it. It's just... like many movies, while I enjoyed it while I experienced it, afterwards the questions pile up and poison my retroactive appreciation. I'm not sure I can write a review that doesn't turn into a feminist rant.
And it would be a feminist rant. The female lead is pretty typical of action plots written by men - smart and spunky, up to a point. While the male lead doesn't quite take away her glasses, lab coat and hair pins and melt her with "Why, you're beautiful!" he does take it upon himself to loosen her up. Which, frankly, she needed, because she was such a damn "good girl" that she wouldn't even tell her fiance that she was allergic to the food he kept feeding her.
I'd forgive her being a stereotype, I can, indeed, roll with everything else she did in the book. (I will admit, he had the other stereotype too - that she civilized the man because he wanted to get her attention and good wishes.) But I just can't look back and forgive this woman for not telling a man for 500+ pages that he was trying to poison her because it would hurt *his* feelings. A man who was going to keep feeding her his favorite food every day of their married life - what DID she think she would do then?
I've been trying to make up my mind if I'm going to review the book I just read. I read it with that in mind, and RtE would take it. It's just... like many movies, while I enjoyed it while I experienced it, afterwards the questions pile up and poison my retroactive appreciation. I'm not sure I can write a review that doesn't turn into a feminist rant.
And it would be a feminist rant. The female lead is pretty typical of action plots written by men - smart and spunky, up to a point. While the male lead doesn't quite take away her glasses, lab coat and hair pins and melt her with "Why, you're beautiful!" he does take it upon himself to loosen her up. Which, frankly, she needed, because she was such a damn "good girl" that she wouldn't even tell her fiance that she was allergic to the food he kept feeding her.
I'd forgive her being a stereotype, I can, indeed, roll with everything else she did in the book. (I will admit, he had the other stereotype too - that she civilized the man because he wanted to get her attention and good wishes.) But I just can't look back and forgive this woman for not telling a man for 500+ pages that he was trying to poison her because it would hurt *his* feelings. A man who was going to keep feeding her his favorite food every day of their married life - what DID she think she would do then?
no subject
Date: 2005-09-26 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-27 12:10 pm (UTC)I want to endorse the book, but the more I think about this point, the more it bugs me. How can a character be described as an unpolished diamond and a tough lawyer in training when she can't even look at a man who is knocking himself out to please her and say "I know you love them, honey, but that will make me sick."
no subject
Date: 2005-09-27 02:01 pm (UTC)Gahhh. I would have thrown the book across the room at some point. Being a foodie with food allergies, with an S.O. who has even worse food allergies, that kind of behavior is just...alien to me. I'd have no respect for the character at all.
(it's really easy to say "oh god, I wish I could, but blue's really not a good skin tone on me.... you go on, though, and tell me what it tastes like -- I've always been curious.")
If this was for Stupid Plot Reasons, both author and editor need to be kicked.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-27 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-27 03:26 pm (UTC)(One star = "This is a dud, don't waste your time." Zero stars = "This is so badly written I couldn't even finish it.")
no subject
Date: 2005-09-27 04:48 pm (UTC)I swear, though, it would have never been even a small running joke if a woman had created that characer.