neadods: (Default)
neadods ([personal profile] neadods) wrote2013-07-16 07:35 am

Wut. Da. fuq.

The human species just seems to have a trope for the idea of Super Secret Hidden Truths that are closely guarded except for every artist/architect/musician in the world, who can't help blabbing in code.

Which is fine if someone wants to see a cheap cheese tray like National Treasure or read Dan Brown, but I have just run into a bunch of people who are very seriously, very truly INVESTED in the idea that yes, Paul McCartney did die in 1966 and was replaced by a ringer who has gone on to become Sir Paul (who may or may not be dead himself at the moment). And that the truth was hidden by... someone. For... reasons. But that the Beatles did indeed leave all those clues in their song lyrics and album covers to warn their Real True Fans.

I just... I can't... seriously? Paul Is Dead conspiracy theorists in this day and age? I don't have enough WTF to soak that up.

[identity profile] signeh.livejournal.com 2013-07-16 03:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Can. Not. Fathom. Did they give you anything remotely resembling a reason for this?

[identity profile] redpanda13.livejournal.com 2013-07-16 04:44 pm (UTC)(link)
If they want to take a trip down fairy lane, just stand back and let them do it. At least they're not hurting anybody, unless one of them starts harassing Sir Paul.

I think conspiracy theorists suffer from a form of pareidolia, seeing patterns where they don't exist, like the Virgin Mary's face on a tortilla.

They used to see demons, now they see UFOs.... Only the object of the delusion changes.

[identity profile] starcat-jewel.livejournal.com 2013-07-16 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Somebody has clearly been reading Heinlein's Double Star, and not figured out that it wasn't a documentary.

[identity profile] wendymr.livejournal.com 2013-07-16 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I had to Google this. And... words fail me.

Except for this: if it's all supposed to be some deep, dark secret, why were the remaining Beatles leaving so many clues all over the place? Explain that, conspiracy nuts!

[identity profile] glamazonwarrior.livejournal.com 2013-07-17 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
My first thought was, "Did Cracked just mention him in an article?"

So, I Googled, and no. (He's in articles on Cracked, of course, but not recently.)

[identity profile] alizarin-nyc.livejournal.com 2013-07-17 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
Wow. That's um. Wow. Really???

[identity profile] penfold-x.livejournal.com 2013-07-20 03:01 am (UTC)(link)
I took my parents on a tour of the Library of Congress (which was fabulous and informative, BTW), and among the brochures and info sheets there was an FAQ that included a question that was something like 'Where can I read the the "Book of Secrets" featured in National Treasure?' How many times did they have to be asked that before they put an explanation in the FAQ that movie writers, well, make stuff up?