neadods: (sherlock)
neadods ([personal profile] neadods) wrote2013-10-16 02:26 pm
Entry tags:

The new deal... isn't

I'm seeing a lot of celebration on the news that there's a Senate deal that's going to fix the mess this country's in. First of all, it's a no-deal until the House blesses it... not that Boehner's got a lot of alternatives, considering that this is the second time he's tried to grandstand with a Republican alternative at the nth second and gotten cut off at the knees by the Tea Party.

Second and far more importantly, look at what the Senate's proposing. Reopening the Government until mid-January. Raising the debt ceiling until mid-Feb. This isn't fixing anything, it's not even deciding anything - it's just kicking the can down the road a few more months.

Nor, even if this does pass and the Government reopens Friday, do the repercussions in my life magically go away. Government open or not, because I used up all my leave, I'm going to have to take the upcoming federal holiday Veteran's Day as yet another day without pay (see previous post about contractor holidays =/= Government holidays.) And because I'm in the hole for leave *and* not earning any back with every day without pay that I take, I'm probably not going to have anything earned back by ChicagoTARDIS, meaning *that* will be without pay, with all the ramifications of that.

And boy howdy, is that going to impact Christmas. Do you think I'd even consider lavish spending on presents under these conditions, with pay lost and a potential repeat of this nonsense right when the bills come due? No one with brain cells would go on a spending spree.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] redpanda13.livejournal.com 2013-10-17 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
I agree on that last part, but they don't have the freedom to vote for a candidate of their choice if the district is so rigged to benefit one party that the other party doesn't even bother wasting money putting up a candidate, and the race is uncontested. There are far too many of those. One would be too many.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2013-10-17 09:14 am (UTC)(link)
I'm with RedPanda we theoretically have the freedom to vote for who we want, but between deliberate disinformation being spread as news, gerrymandering, and voter restriction we don't actually have the power to vote in who we want. Especially if it's close. The court told us who won Bush v Gore, not an accurate count of the popular vote

That ain't no freedom of the polls.