I don't really disagree with the overall point, but this bit kind of distracted me from everything else. With male characters, if Sherlock steals their thunder- the story is still driven by a man. How could that remotely be used to support a charge of "misandry"?
The key driver of the story was a man. NOW the key driver of the story is ... still a man.
no subject
I don't really disagree with the overall point, but this bit kind of distracted me from everything else. With male characters, if Sherlock steals their thunder- the story is still driven by a man. How could that remotely be used to support a charge of "misandry"?
The key driver of the story was a man. NOW the key driver of the story is ... still a man.