I'm still trying to wrap my head around the whole thing where the "if they wanted privacy" analogy means you're saying that RPS is the same as rape. Especially with the part where you said immediately thereafter that it's NOT. *boggle*

I dunno about anybody else, but I immediately saw it as taking issue with the logic formula itself, i.e. "Harmful action X is okay because Victim Y 'invited' it through Action Z." If people want to argue that the truth or falsity of this logic is different for different values of X and Y, fine. But at no time did you say that all values of X are the same.