because of course when THEY'RE doing it, well, That's Different.

Bing bing bing. What I don't get (from reading the thread) is that they have any concept that what some (not all) of the people in Nea's thread were saying, "We think this is a pretty nasty invasion of people's privacy and rights, and unless you give a decent arguement (not, "Well, because she showed up in public wearing a tight skirt she gave her consent to whatever happened to her."), we're really not going to change our minds." Which apparently got twisted around to... um, because we don't agree with the great amorphous "Them", we totally SUX.