neadods: (tbabyJack)
neadods ([personal profile] neadods) wrote2008-04-05 01:24 pm
Entry tags:

Torchwood thoughts

I've been offline for over a day, and it's a day that had a season finale in it and a season opener that a lot of my friends watch. Wish me luck, I'm tackling the friends list... hopefully I'll get through before the second explosion of the Who premiere!

Re: Torchwood. Judging from M's reaction, it wasn't any better if you weren't spoiled rotten for it. I liked a lot of what they did this season, and the idea that death comes early for the Torchwood personnel is a good one... but I think they could have handled concept, execution, and plot much better than they did for this episode.

First of all, they're failing the racial subtext again. This season we find out three things about the minority character:
1) She's an inadvertent black widow. Every single person she's romantically interested in dies. Oh, and as usual, she's not interested in anyone of her own racial background. Or, arguably, she appears uninterested because she never sees one!
2) Her untrustworthy actions in Greeks Bearing Gifts is part of a long-term pattern of behavior and not a moment's weakness.
3) She's dead.

Second, how is Jack sane anymore? Seriously. He was tortured by the Master for a year, and he comes back and gets to be tortured by his missing brother for over a millennia. We know he still feels pain. How is he even remotely able to cope with an extended life that has meant so much agony?

Third, I liked Captain John better when he was a nutbag. It's like the neutering of Spike all over again. James does gleefully homicidal nutbag so well, too.

Fourth, having grown up near Three Mile Island during the big blow, I apparently know a shitload more about nuclear plants than the author does. Like now anyone with three brain cells to knock together has manual/backup/generator safeties on the reactor in case the main power goes out. And how no matter what happens, it is simply impossible to VENT ANYTHING INTO A BUILDING!!!! OSHA, or the Welsh equivalent, would presumably Have Something To Say About That.

Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, the show did have some moments... although at this point in time, I couldn't cite any. No, one. I did like Owen raging against the second dying of the light, but there was just no way they could do anything else with the character, not after his entire life got pasted on, yay. That whole story went nowhere, and was, IMO, the beginning of the end for this season. And not in the "they're running out of episodes" definition of the end.

ETA: I can think of other moments - the Andy/Rhys interaction was brilliant. "I ask and you tell me the secret?" And the bit with the grim reapers may have been an Indy Jones ripoff, but it's still a funny one.

I am a bit amused, though, comparing the reality against the original set of spoilers that I heard and ranted about... the spoilers that said that Tosh and Owen were going to be the only *survivors* and that the show was going to become a kiddie show. We know how the first settled out, and I'm betting that the second is going to be that they're simply going to shift slightly before the watershed, with the minor changes already happening. If you go back, you can tell *exactly* what scenes will be cut by what the characters are saying. If they're swearing, it's a cut; if they're using euphemisms, it's staying. Personally, I don't see a huge difference between Gwen saying "stop handing me crap" and "stop handing me shit," so either way it goes, I'm cool.

[identity profile] thanatos-kalos.livejournal.com 2008-04-05 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Where is the post you're referencing? Do you have a date or link, so I can find it?

I do have to say that I'm not sure I agree with counting Suzie as a minority; she was played by a South Asian actress, but based on the admittedly single bit of evidence of her last name, I'd have thought she was of Italian extraction.

You don't have to look hard. That's the part that pisses me off!

I honestly don't see it (though I haven't found the post you're referencing yet). Assuming that doesn't change my mind, I think we may have to agree to disagree. :(

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2008-04-05 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
My link here. It was repeated on [livejournal.com profile] lifeonmartha and the topic has been discussed a great deal on the anti-racism comm [livejournal.com profile] deadbrowwalking, not to mention the private LJs of several people, including (off the top of my head) [livejournal.com profile] nostalgia_lj, [livejournal.com profile] spiralsheep, and more who aren't on my f-list. Nos hasn't tagged, but check Spiral's "Doctor who" tag. Nos garnered several trolls on the subject, including one infamous guy with a sexually-oriented screenname who came in, demanded that we stop discussing the subject, and announced that women are too stupid to understand TV. [livejournal.com profile] kateorman first tried to shut the conversation down, then said that she wanted to study it in a comm she started (and which originally had a post telling black commentors that she wasn't talking to them) and now tries to set the standards as to how it is discussed, usually leaving in a huff saying that some people are determined to be haters... ask [livejournal.com profile] lizbee. Racial subtext and how certain subtexts always happen to certain characters has been going on since the end of last season.

For instance... let's take maid costumes. Both Rose and Martha and her family all ended up in maids costumes. Well, if it happened to Rose, too, it's just one of those things, right?

Except that when Rose ended up in a maid's/lunchlady costume, she expressly got scenes where she got to express how demeaning she found it, and the worst thing that happened was her alt!verse mother threatening to fire her. Also, only Rose (and Astrid) wore such costumes... Jackie and to date Donna never have. So not every character, not every member of that racial group, not ever family member.

Whereas, within 13 episodes, every single member of Martha's family including herself ends up in one, and under circumstances where anything other than cheerful compliance merits instant punishment - Martha at the school, her family under the Master. Every member of that family. Every member of that racial group (Mickey, as Martha's father, being relegated to mechanics, although in Mickey's case it's by choice.)

So maid's costumes "just happen" if they're needed by plot. But the circumstances around those costumes do not "just happen" and they are weighted with major racial freight.

For another instance.... there are happy white/white couples and there are happy black/white couples, but there are no happy black/black couples. Furthermore, in many of the black/white couples, the black character is running after the white one offering devoted affection and getting distracted secondhand disinterest from the white one. Rose, always treated Mickey as a second-class backup if Jack and the Doctor aren't there. The Doctor, treating Martha as second-best to the point that she leaves him over it (and yet he was over Rose enough to invite Donna along even though Donna was so soon that she was handling Rose's clothing.) Martha's father running after his blonde golddigger.

And to loop back to Torchwood, Tosh running after Owen, who preferred in the premiere to rape a white woman rather than look at Tosh, and would, throughout the rest of his run, only have sex with white women.

[identity profile] thanatos-kalos.livejournal.com 2008-04-06 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
*reads*

That is interesting, though I'm afraid I still see these things as more a function of character, rather than race, i.e., Ten being so screwed up emotionally after both Rose's loss and Donna's rejection that he's not interested in taking chances. I agree that the whole 'Mickey-the-idiot' thing did get annoying rapidly, though, again, I think that's more Nine seeing a potential rival and Rose devaluing her home life. One could also argue that it represents the potential of the Everyman to become a hero. Also, I wish you wouldn't demean mechanics; I know quite a lot of them and, while they're perhaps not as high on the social ladder as others, they're some of the most technically-oriented, intelligent people I know.

As for the rest, I understand the points you're making, but I think we disagree on a fundamental point; I believe that nothing should ever get in the way of character, and that includes either doing something to a character because of the ethnic background of the actor playing them, or not doing something to a character because of the ethnic background of the actor playing them. That's how I interpret what I see; characters behaving in a way that is true to their natures, and if that involves a character putting a group of people in servants' costumes because it's in line with what the character would do, then that's the story. I respect your opinion, but I just don't share it.