neadods: (Default)
neadods ([personal profile] neadods) wrote2011-04-24 10:48 am
Entry tags:

Post 2 of 3: Reactions to Doctor Who

No plot talk, and not a lot to say either; there are moments of glee (Rory gets the best line EVER in "In all fairness, the universe did explode") and moments of "okay, now you're both setting up and paying off distant plot points."

But on the whole, I found it choppy and unsatisfying. Yes, I know it's an unfinished story; it's most likely not going to be resolved until the end of the season. The whole season, not the mini season.

And wow, is that a British view of America. I'm more amused than anything else, but the entire country isn't really vast, paranoid, and gun happy.

ETA: Spoilers in comments
ext_3965: (River Moar Awesome than You!)

[identity profile] persiflage-1.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 02:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I think many of us know that most of America isn't vast, paranoid and gun happy - but it comes over that way often enough (esp in the news) for it to be a cliche...

I confess I laughed most at 'Legs, Nose & Mrs Robinson' / 'I hate you'... *snickers*

(Reminds me, I need to get a good cap of River in her jeans for icon purposes because DAMN does she look mighty fine in them!)

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Alex Kingston looks mighty fine, period! :)

Come to think of it, America is actually vast. Just not vast and empty like *that.* (Although "name the shooting spot" was turning into a bit of a party game. Hello, Hoover Dam!)
ext_3965: (In Memoriam: Nick C and Lis S)

[identity profile] persiflage-1.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)
LOL That's true, she does! But she looked extra fine in those jeans!

America's certainly vast compared to little old Britain!

[identity profile] acroyear70.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 03:15 pm (UTC)(link)
actually, it wasn't/isn't Hoover. Hoover has some landmarks on the reservoir side that aren't there in the shots we've seen. I know what dam it is, though...

[identity profile] acroyear70.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 03:57 pm (UTC)(link)
see my own lj i just posted w/ spoilercut.

[identity profile] dbskyler.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 04:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Yep, someone at my house got all excited, saying, "That's Lake Powell!" And the rest of us had never heard of Lake Powell . . . (it does look gorgeous, though).

[identity profile] acroyear70.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I hadn't specifically recognized Powell as such, more that (as noted above) there are specific landmarks, 4 towers on the northern side of Hoover that weren't in the shots which is how I knew it wasn't Hoover and guessed Glen Canyon from there.
ext_5608: (doctor who)

[identity profile] wiliqueen.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
River Song: So fabulous she can even carry off the Texas Tuxedo! :-D

[identity profile] tiggerallyn.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
But on the whole, I found it choppy and unsatisfying.

Same here. I wrote on my blog this morning that the script was Moffat doing his best Brannon Braga. "The Impossible Astronaut" had the aimlessness of a late Star Trek: Voyager or a Star Trek: Enterprise episode. It's easily Moffat's weakest Doctor Who script.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 03:00 pm (UTC)(link)
I dunno, the Christmas Shark episode doesn't hold up very well either...

I hold enough faith that in retrospect it's going to get better, when joined up to other episodes. But as a standalone, its only real attraction is in introducing the silence (meh) and a general attitude of "How ya gonna get out of that one, Batman?"

[identity profile] tiggerallyn.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I dunno, the Christmas Shark episode doesn't hold up very well either...

My main problem there is when the Doctor brings young Kazran forward into the future to meet his old self, because that should blow a major hole in everything we'd seen over the previous forty-five minutes. The Doctor had already rewritten Kazran's life. Now, he's rewritten it again, only we don't get to see how Kazran's life unfolds in this new version of history.

I hold enough faith that in retrospect it's going to get better, when joined up to other episodes.

In spite of my negative reaction to the episode, I agree with this. Months down the road, after the thirteenth episode, we'll go, "Ah-ha! That's how it all fits together!"

But as a standalone, its only real attraction is in introducing the silence (meh) and a general attitude of "How ya gonna get out of that one, Batman?"

I applaud Moffat for having enough confidence in his audience and his position that he feels that he can start the season off with a rather incident-free episode. Yet, I also don't feel hooked by what I saw.

Without seeing the second part, I don't know what could have made this first part structured better and more engaging. I feel like we needed to see more of the Silents. I also feel that we needed something that suggested that they're bad/threatening (other than evaporating Joy, because that seemed completely random) and that they have a plan that the Doctor must thwart. I can understand why the episode ends with the astronaut (because we'd seen an astronaut do bad things at the beginning), but I don't feel a connection between the Silents and the mystery surrounding the little girl. Maybe there's ultimately not a connection and these two plots will run in parallel.

Based on the rapturous reactions to the London and New York premieres, I wonder if the BBC erred by not showing the episodes as a two-hour season premier.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 03:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Without seeing the second part, I don't know what could have made this first part structured better and more engaging

I can.

1) More of the buildup of The Silence as a villain (as opposed to an event of some sort) through the last season.

2) Not solving the problem of the big bad by the end of this episode. That whole "You're under hostile occupation and don't know it/problem solved!" *really* bothered me.

3) Fewer smash cuts in the cull and capture scenes and a more organic shift than "suddenly three months later/next breath new scene/next breath new scene" set of transitions.

4) More of a buildup to the little girl/Amy being told she will bring the Silence into the world/the pregnancy whatever at the end.

I think the BBC SERIOUSLY erred in not having a 2-hour premiere, although frankly I can't imagine what he can do in hour 2 that will make hour 1 come across less like plot notes and more like a plot.

[identity profile] stlscape.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 04:18 pm (UTC)(link)
ITA. If this were my first introduction to Who, it would probably be my last. Nothing in (just) this episode made me *care* about any of the characters. I felt like Rory was the most 100%-there, fully-solid character, and the rest were not fully present, were a bit misty, weren't giving the camera 100%.

I'm glad I have enough knowledge of the characters from the last season to expect payoff this season, but, yeah, VERY weak script, IMHO. Plot notes vs plot is an excellent description.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 05:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm wondering a bit if Moffat is really seeing it as a premiere episode instead of a bridge, considering that last season was really "part 1" of whatever idea he's got.

Still. Meh!

[identity profile] tiggerallyn.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 04:59 pm (UTC)(link)
More of the buildup of The Silence as a villain (as opposed to an event of some sort) through the last season.

Or, really, any build-up of the Silents as a villain. Other than vaporizing Joy and acting menacing toward Amy in one scene, the Silents were just creepy aliens.

Over on Outpost Gallifrey, someone quotes Moffat as saying during Confidential that "What the Silents represent is a far, far bigger deal." Really, Moffat? I wish Moffat had gone to some effort in this episode to make the Silents any sort of deal.

Yes, it is a clever narrative conceit to have a "big bad" that the audience knows about but the characters don't, which is why I'm coming around to the idea that Moffat really needed to end the episode with the characters unambiguously recognizing and remembering the Silents than Amy shooting at a space-suited girl. (Which, by the way, I'm not convinced is real — a little girl wouldn't fit in that suit.)

As it is, the more I think about this episode, the more I feel like it was a wasted hour. I don't feel like the story has started yet. And that makes me think about the classic piece of editorial advice — if your story starts on page ten, you throw out pages one through nine. They may be cool scenes, they may have fantastic character moments, but if they're not in service to your plot, they're unwanted and unnecessary.

I need to stop thinking about "The Impossible Astronaut."

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 05:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Or, really, any build-up of the Silents as a villain

I have to watch the confidential and find out if it's The Silents or The Silence. I kinda dig the second, so until corrected...

But regardless, WTF with "Our planet was taken over by the Silence" and "The Silence is coming"? We've just had proof that you don't actually *know* when your planet is taken over and apparently the Silence has been there for forever and a day, so it's hardly com*ing* unless -- and oh, lordy, someone has probably already done it - there's Rule 34 fic out there already.

I wish Moffat had gone to some effort in this episode to make the Silents any sort of deal.

Seriously! Lookie, big bad! All gone now.

My problem is, the more I think about it, the more the problems with it overwhelm what I enjoyed about the episode. Which is, alas, pretty much how I feel about last season too.

[identity profile] tiggerallyn.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 05:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I keep using "Silents" because of the closing credits to "The Impossible Astronaut," which list Marnix Van Den Broeke as "The Silent."

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 08:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah.

[identity profile] tiggerallyn.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 03:03 pm (UTC)(link)
That said? "Welcome to America." BANG! Funniest. Moment. Ever.

An observation about that.

River is clearly proficient enough with a gun that she can safely shoot the Stetson off the Doctor's head.

But she can't hit someone in a spacesuit lumbering away in the water? The astronauts couldn't move for crap in those spacesuits. River should have easily taken down the astronaut. That assumes that River wanted to take down the astronaut.

Thus, I have to wonder if River wasn't deliberately missing the target.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 03:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Missing, or the bullets weren't doing damage for one reason or another? Not entirely sure which.

[identity profile] doyle_sb4.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 04:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I didn't think she did miss, just that - in the grand tradition of Doctor Who villains - the astronaut was immune to bullets.

[identity profile] taiamu.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 03:19 pm (UTC)(link)
The portrayal of Americans didn't really bother me. I kind of expected the gun-happy implications, to begin with, but also, the Americans we see are only a handful, and they are members of the Secret Service--it's their job to be that paranoid. ;)

If they start portraying the average American that way--someone at the diner, say--then I'll be annoyed.

[identity profile] acroyear70.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 03:26 pm (UTC)(link)
heh. it used to be that the opinion most brits had of the Americans was not the gun-toting, but rather the fact that we eat probably 50% more than they do at a regular meal.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 03:41 pm (UTC)(link)
We kinda do.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 03:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Point!

[identity profile] jo-mako.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 04:39 pm (UTC)(link)
You're familiar with the east coast, aren't you? Trust me, get across the Mississippi, and the country is indeed ridiculously vast and desolate. I80 through Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming in particular...you can drive for hours and not see another sign of humanity. It's actually really pretty.

And despite the episode being a bit choppy it places, it was deliciously good fun!

[identity profile] acroyear70.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 04:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Everything shown was shot in Utah. Moab (where they stayed, according to Confidential) is in the center of the south-east corner of the state, probably 2 hours drive from Glen Canyon (next week's dam) and Lake Powell (the funeral lake). Monument Valley (the opening sequences) is an hour south-south-east, running in between Canyonlands and Arches national parks. That part of the valley is a Utah State Park.

[identity profile] jo-mako.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh yeah, been through there a few times.

[identity profile] acroyear70.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 04:56 pm (UTC)(link)
and yes, much of that region really is a bunch of beautiful nothing.

Shots taken from Vegas to the Grand Canyon and back, plus the route from Vegas to Zion National Park.

[identity profile] jo-mako.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)
I have driven cross country over a dozen times and have to admit, that the expanses of nothing in the west half of the States is bloody gorgeous! But then I grew up in the Outback as a kid and find that kind of scenery comforting.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 05:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm extremely in the minority, I know, but I'm not at all engaged. And I'd hoped for so much more out of the guy who's written two of my favorite episodes.

Trust me, get across the Mississippi, and the country is indeed ridiculously vast and desolate

I've made my point badly. Yes, huge chunks of the country look like that. My point was that it's not What America Looks Like any more than the Maine coast or the midwest farmland or LA is. They're all equally What America Looks Like, which tends not to be at all What The Rest of America Looks Like.

[identity profile] themis1.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 05:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, actually I thought the USA came off rather better than the UK usually does in American shows. Which only ever film in London, and populate it with people with wildly inaccurate accents!

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 08:03 pm (UTC)(link)
These days a lot of filming in America has been outsourced to Canada anyway, just to make things even stranger.

[identity profile] belovedwarrior.livejournal.com 2011-04-25 03:12 am (UTC)(link)
It seems to me that most American movies take place in New York City or LA. I noticed this after I went to the UK and had several people ask where I lived in relation to those two cities. ;)

I resorted to telling people I lived a two hour drive south of Canada.. straight in the middle. :)

UK locations tend to be London or some quaint little village with a massive pub.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-25 10:35 am (UTC)(link)
I remember seeing an article in the paper when the Chicago-based horror movie hit the theaters basically saying "Whoo hoo! It's our turn now!"

What's starting to amuse me is that London or the village with the pub tends to be played by Cardiff, it seems, while both NY and LA are so often played by Vancouver.

[identity profile] redpanda13.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)
But twee Cotswold cottages or Trafalgar Square isn't What Britain Looks Like either. You have to make a selection.

I'm not sure this episode would have drawn me to see more if it were the first one I'd ever seen, but as I read the comments above I kept thinking of Straczynski saying to people who criticized episodes of Babylon 5 that they should trust him because they had NO idea what he was building up to. That said, it may be more of an issue if it's the first episode of a season and you're trying to pull in new viewers... but Who seems to be enough of a cultural phenomenon by now that it may not need hordes of new viewers.

Aren't Apollo astronauts pretty much always positive figures, or am I just showing my age? It seemed weird to have a scary, murderous astronaut (granted, the suit was a bit off).

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 08:02 pm (UTC)(link)
But twee Cotswold cottages or Trafalgar Square isn't What Britain Looks Like either

Point.

I kept thinking of Straczynski saying to people who criticized episodes of Babylon 5 that they should trust him because they had NO idea what he was building up to

Which never entirely convinced me back in the day. Just because he was building up to something big didn't mean that he didn't also turn out clunkers now and then.

[identity profile] redpanda13.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Which he admitted. There was one script he said he wanted to drop off a pier. But often he was building up to something jaw-dropping.

[identity profile] jo-mako.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 07:54 pm (UTC)(link)
To each their own, and I don't begrudge you that at all. After S3, I've taken a 'just watch and enjoy' approach to DW...it has made my life much easier.

lol no worries. I know what you mean, but I am used to the western half of the country...vast expanses of breath taking beautiful nothing. Even California...the heaviest populated state in the country has areas like I described in my comment.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-24 08:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I try to watch and enjoy -- I consider myself more of a Sherlock fan than a Who fan at the moment -- but I can't help nitpicking.

[identity profile] prof-pangaea.livejournal.com 2011-04-25 02:42 pm (UTC)(link)
but the entire country isn't really vast, paranoid, and gun happy.

haha, what part of america are you from?

oh well I LOVED IT and must say i did not find it choppy in the least. ("the pandorica opens" -- now that was choppy as hell and still is, even on a rewatch, but enjoyable nonetheless).

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-26 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm from the part where guns are pretty tightly controlled. It's not that we won't shoot you, it's that we've got to get the ammo out of the back seat and then unlock the gunsafe in the trunk first...

[identity profile] prof-pangaea.livejournal.com 2011-04-27 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
i feel as if this comment merely proves my point, if that's what the part of the country where guns are "tightly controlled" is like...

(and yah i'm from the northeast too, though i've lived in plenty of stats, including palces where it is perfectly legal to carry around a loaded gun in your purse as you shop at target).