neadods: (Default)
neadods ([personal profile] neadods) wrote2011-04-29 10:27 am
Entry tags:

My Only Royal Wedding Post

Yes, I got up to watch it. It's news that doesn't involve bombs; celebrity that doesn't involve being a drunken, stoned Hollywood has-been. That's the kind of history I like to witness.

The dress was perfect. Streamlined, flattering - and classic enough that nobody's going to be pointing and laughing 20 years later, plus it'll look good on most of the body types that'll be emulating it.

And my favorite crowd moment? The sign being waved that said "Checkmate, Kate, You've Taken the King."
ext_3685: Stylized electric-blue teapot, with blue text caption "Brewster North" (Default)

[identity profile] brewsternorth.livejournal.com 2011-04-29 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)
That was an amazing dress, yes. Someone on another comm complained it was "just pretty", but I think the thing that stood out about it was precisely the understatedness of it.

Heh, I think my favourite moments were split between a snapshot of the Queen reviewing the troops and Prince Harry going "must... not... grin...", and all the wild and wonderful hats people were wearing for the occasion.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-29 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)
the thing that stood out about it was precisely the understatedness of it

THIS. In 10-20-30 years, that dress is still going to look good. Maybe people then will sniff that the sleeves should bell a bit or the neckline should have a scallop, but the lines? Eternal.

Wonderful is not the word I would use for those hats. "Eldrich horror" is how I would describe 9/10s of them...

[identity profile] redpanda13.livejournal.com 2011-04-30 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
From K:

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/princess-beatrices-royal-wedding-hat-183707

"I think it's actually a uterus and fallopian tubes," joked one member of the tan hat with a swirling bow.

"In the church, it was like the devil peering over the Queen's shoulder. Scary really," joked another.

"She looked like a creature from Dr Who," wrote another.

Google on "Beatrice butterfly hat" for another amazing one. Facebook comment: 'Oh Ruth Ann....! I found an image of that hat on a blog, which was saying "it looks like the butterflies are trying to find their way into her brain". They're not - they're trying to find their way out...'

[identity profile] flaviarassen.livejournal.com 2011-04-30 05:51 am (UTC)(link)
I think it was supposed to be a Lover's Knot. More's the pity, because it was not only stupid looking, her entire outfit was the totally wrong color for her (made her look like a blob because it dulled her whole face - AND she wore that horrible gothy eye-makeup!). Don't get me wrong - Goth is a terrific fashion statement. Somewhere ELSE. Or, at least, have an outfit that goes with it - which this one did not.

But, maybe I have no class - I loved her butterfly hat. It's a Philip Treacy - and, coincidentally enough, he collaborated most closely w/Alexander McQueen (who I was HOPING could do the dress - or, at least, his house - but never thought in a million years she would pick.

Punchline of the day? I mean, besides all the "Me next, Harry!" signs? Her dress was almost exactly like MINE!!! The differences were so minor - mine was white, hers was off-white. My lace was beaded, hers was not. She had a modest v-neck, I had a collar. And her skirt was pleated, mine was gathered. Oh, wait - my yoke was tulle - that's actually the biggest difference. But the over-bodice & the sleeves were all lace. I only wish I had been able to contact David Tutera to bet him a wedding that his "pick" was going to be entirely wrong (which it was. giggle!).

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-30 12:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Her dress was almost exactly like MINE!!!

I've seen pictures of Kate's gown next to Grace Kelly's gown, and they really are the same thing, just with slightly different details.

[identity profile] flaviarassen.livejournal.com 2011-04-30 03:06 pm (UTC)(link)
The big first-noticeable difference between hers & Kelly's was the exact shape of the skirt (Kelly's was poofy-er), & Kelly's had a horizontal waist piece, but, good call - yes, absolutely.

But I just saw the official pictures - & it turns out that the bottom half (or so) of Kate's dress was patterned - either brocade or damask! Not plain/smooth as the news cameras seemed to show (HD still isn't that good, I guess (-: ). Mine was definitely plain satin (& a trifle shinier than I wanted, but the other 95% was there, so I snapped it up. Total bargain, too, but I digress (-: ).

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-30 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
The cameras were washing out several details. The commentators kept trying to describe what color of blue the mother of the bride was wearing, and all I saw was pale gray.

[identity profile] flaviarassen.livejournal.com 2011-05-01 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, we noticed that, too. We could barely tell the bit about "blue" in her outfit.

Turns out the bottom (half or so) of Kate's skirt was embroidered!! Once I had gotten anything like a close-up look at it, I still thought it was probably brocade. But I am so glad she didn't wear white-white; this was a great color on her.

Still can't reconcile myself to Camilla's outfit, color-wise. Hat was beautiful, of course - then again, of course, it was a Treacy.

And, it has to be said: both Beatrice & Eugenie need to have trainers or keepers when they go out shopping (Whip & a chair? Stun guns? Tasers?). Eugenie specifically needs to either lose the weight or dress to it - one or the other, please! Vivian Westwood & generous curves do not do well together - the term "couch" comes to mind (I don't think I'd dare be dressed by her, & everyone's always telling me how thin I still am!). Of course, Eugenie did much better than Beatrice when it came to the after-party:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1381772/Princesses-Beatrice-Eugenie-Royal-Wedding-spirit-Queens-gala-dinner.html

I don't think I have to tell you which picture I think is worth 1,000 words.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-05-01 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
Now why couldn't Eugenie have worn something like that (in a different color) to the wedding? It would have been perfect.

Beatrice simply shouldn't be allowed to dress herself, period.

Hat was beautiful, of course - then again, of course, it was a Treacy

TBH, every time I saw a Treacy hat specifically mentioned, I thought it was horrible. I saw only one in the entire crowd I liked, and that for only a nanosecond.

[identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com 2011-04-30 12:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Ia fthagn!