My Only Royal Wedding Post
Apr. 29th, 2011 10:27 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Yes, I got up to watch it. It's news that doesn't involve bombs; celebrity that doesn't involve being a drunken, stoned Hollywood has-been. That's the kind of history I like to witness.
The dress was perfect. Streamlined, flattering - and classic enough that nobody's going to be pointing and laughing 20 years later, plus it'll look good on most of the body types that'll be emulating it.
And my favorite crowd moment? The sign being waved that said "Checkmate, Kate, You've Taken the King."
The dress was perfect. Streamlined, flattering - and classic enough that nobody's going to be pointing and laughing 20 years later, plus it'll look good on most of the body types that'll be emulating it.
And my favorite crowd moment? The sign being waved that said "Checkmate, Kate, You've Taken the King."
no subject
Date: 2011-04-29 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-29 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-29 05:05 pm (UTC)*giggle*snort*
I rolled over at 5 a.m. and thought whatthehell. During the bits when people were being introduced or hymns were sung, I threw on clothing and fed the cats.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-29 04:17 pm (UTC)(There was also one that said "I'm holding out for Harry." LOL SIGNS)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-29 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-29 05:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-30 08:22 pm (UTC)Before the waving from the balcony, the people holding the "Checkmate Kate" tried to hold their sign up, and the crowd immediately starting calling for them to lower it - it was very easy to block the view of the balcony.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-30 08:45 pm (UTC)it was very easy to block the view of the balcony
It would be. (I thought the same about most of the hats, sometimes even before "That's so ugly." "How rude - nobody behind you will be able to see a thing!")
But I'm glad they got the sign up on TV. Hopefully they lowered it right away after!
no subject
Date: 2011-04-29 05:12 pm (UTC)WHAT THE HELL was wrong with Harry's hair? No one could have combed it? They have no product at the castle?
I loved it. Boo on cynicism. We should have some happy news every day as far as I'm concerned.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-29 10:26 pm (UTC)I've seen a shot of it on her hand as she walked in. It must have been taken off at some point.
Harry's probably afraid to touch his hair for fear more of it runs away!
no subject
Date: 2011-04-30 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-29 07:52 pm (UTC)Heh, I think my favourite moments were split between a snapshot of the Queen reviewing the troops and Prince Harry going "must... not... grin...", and all the wild and wonderful hats people were wearing for the occasion.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-29 10:28 pm (UTC)THIS. In 10-20-30 years, that dress is still going to look good. Maybe people then will sniff that the sleeves should bell a bit or the neckline should have a scallop, but the lines? Eternal.
Wonderful is not the word I would use for those hats. "Eldrich horror" is how I would describe 9/10s of them...
no subject
Date: 2011-04-30 02:41 am (UTC)http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/princess-beatrices-royal-wedding-hat-183707
"I think it's actually a uterus and fallopian tubes," joked one member of the tan hat with a swirling bow.
"In the church, it was like the devil peering over the Queen's shoulder. Scary really," joked another.
"She looked like a creature from Dr Who," wrote another.
Google on "Beatrice butterfly hat" for another amazing one. Facebook comment: 'Oh Ruth Ann....! I found an image of that hat on a blog, which was saying "it looks like the butterflies are trying to find their way into her brain". They're not - they're trying to find their way out...'
no subject
Date: 2011-04-30 03:19 am (UTC)http://digitallife.today.com/_news/2011/04/29/6556070-facebook-cthulhu-hat-a-bold-choice-for-royal-wedding-
no subject
Date: 2011-04-30 05:51 am (UTC)But, maybe I have no class - I loved her butterfly hat. It's a Philip Treacy - and, coincidentally enough, he collaborated most closely w/Alexander McQueen (who I was HOPING could do the dress - or, at least, his house - but never thought in a million years she would pick.
Punchline of the day? I mean, besides all the "Me next, Harry!" signs? Her dress was almost exactly like MINE!!! The differences were so minor - mine was white, hers was off-white. My lace was beaded, hers was not. She had a modest v-neck, I had a collar. And her skirt was pleated, mine was gathered. Oh, wait - my yoke was tulle - that's actually the biggest difference. But the over-bodice & the sleeves were all lace. I only wish I had been able to contact David Tutera to bet him a wedding that his "pick" was going to be entirely wrong (which it was. giggle!).
no subject
Date: 2011-04-30 12:07 pm (UTC)I've seen pictures of Kate's gown next to Grace Kelly's gown, and they really are the same thing, just with slightly different details.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-30 03:06 pm (UTC)But I just saw the official pictures - & it turns out that the bottom half (or so) of Kate's dress was patterned - either brocade or damask! Not plain/smooth as the news cameras seemed to show (HD still isn't that good, I guess (-: ). Mine was definitely plain satin (& a trifle shinier than I wanted, but the other 95% was there, so I snapped it up. Total bargain, too, but I digress (-: ).
no subject
Date: 2011-04-30 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-01 12:04 am (UTC)Turns out the bottom (half or so) of Kate's skirt was embroidered!! Once I had gotten anything like a close-up look at it, I still thought it was probably brocade. But I am so glad she didn't wear white-white; this was a great color on her.
Still can't reconcile myself to Camilla's outfit, color-wise. Hat was beautiful, of course - then again, of course, it was a Treacy.
And, it has to be said: both Beatrice & Eugenie need to have trainers or keepers when they go out shopping (Whip & a chair? Stun guns? Tasers?). Eugenie specifically needs to either lose the weight or dress to it - one or the other, please! Vivian Westwood & generous curves do not do well together - the term "couch" comes to mind (I don't think I'd dare be dressed by her, & everyone's always telling me how thin I still am!). Of course, Eugenie did much better than Beatrice when it came to the after-party:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1381772/Princesses-Beatrice-Eugenie-Royal-Wedding-spirit-Queens-gala-dinner.html
I don't think I have to tell you which picture I think is worth 1,000 words.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-01 12:32 am (UTC)Beatrice simply shouldn't be allowed to dress herself, period.
Hat was beautiful, of course - then again, of course, it was a Treacy
TBH, every time I saw a Treacy hat specifically mentioned, I thought it was horrible. I saw only one in the entire crowd I liked, and that for only a nanosecond.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-30 12:05 pm (UTC)