I get the impression that ASH itself is one of Shreffler's problems, considering that he cites the founding of the BSI as a date special in the hearts of fans. Not the female ones!
there was discussion at the time, and some folks thought that Phil was either writing tongue in cheek or had a stick up his kazoo
I think that's been definitively answered now. :/
I'm sorry I missed that ASH paper. Maybe someday... I've got my eyes on ASH again.
It's for sure that Shreffler speaks for a small minority now - now that the Journal welcomed the Babes and the Ritchie/Cumberbatch fans in print, and there is quite a lot of the old guard circling in defense of the new kids now.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2013-01-27 01:23 am (UTC)I get the impression that ASH itself is one of Shreffler's problems, considering that he cites the founding of the BSI as a date special in the hearts of fans. Not the female ones!
there was discussion at the time, and some folks thought that Phil was either writing tongue in cheek or had a stick up his kazoo
I think that's been definitively answered now. :/
I'm sorry I missed that ASH paper. Maybe someday... I've got my eyes on ASH again.
It's for sure that Shreffler speaks for a small minority now - now that the Journal welcomed the Babes and the Ritchie/Cumberbatch fans in print, and there is quite a lot of the old guard circling in defense of the new kids now.