Date: 2014-09-18 09:45 pm (UTC)
I'm really not sure what you think the debate about Scottish independence is about

From what I've read, the yes vote is about:
- complete control of natural resources (specifically oil wealth)
- complete control of governance instead of an England-tilted Parliament
- lower taxes/no austerity because no money will be going to bail out the debt of England
and more along those lines; gain complete fiscal/political control within its own borders against a theoretically combination government that in practice does not practice what is most important to the people within said border, instead imposing unwanted and likely unnecessary strictures on the populace of the border.

Absolutely none of which is remotely unfamiliar to America, considering that Texas cites those exact reasons to threaten secession on a semi-annual basis.

The countries I've seen cited in the British press as examples of what an independent Scotland could become seem to tilt towards Norway and Denmark.

Both of which are members of the European Federation of Food Banks.

And that is why my jaw dropped. Because I do not see any concrete connection between leaving the UK and eliminating food banks, as Moira implies.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

neadods: (Default)
neadods

February 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314 15161718
19202122232425
262728    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 02:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios