Date: 2005-06-03 02:04 pm (UTC)
It's patronizing because (among other things) it suggests that any woman throughout history could think and act like a "modern, independent" woman if she just had enough spunk. Considering that we're still in the shadow of a long, intense historical propaganda to belittle and obfuscate the "nature of women", I find the idea that women could always easily transcend their culture to be counterproductive.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

neadods: (Default)
neadods

February 2023

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
121314 15161718
19202122232425
262728    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 12:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios