Various and Sundry
Dec. 5th, 2012 09:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have decided on my resolutions for 2013, or more accurately, one overarching resolution: Git 'er done. All the things that need to be renovated, all the places that need to be picked up, all the stuff that needs to be gone through, all the organizing. Git 'er done, so that I can head into 2014 with a clear slate and the ability to find my shit.
This does not prelude my being at Gally and ChicagoTARDIS for the Doctor Who anniversary year, plus worshiping at the altar of Scott The First in Stratford. I *am* a fan, after all.
Speaking of fans, you may be aware that someone famous in comics has mansplained that cosplaying women at comic conventions are not "real" fans. I've seen scholarly takedowns and feminist takedowns, but Dork Towers does the best job of it in 15 panels. Do NOT fuck with costumers, dude; we know from experience just how much damage can be done to the human body with a rotary cutter.
And while I'm on the topic of self-appointed gateway keepers acting badly, the men behind I Hear of Sherlock Everywhere have put their foot in it by getting all "OMG, WTF?" over faunlock - which I had to go look up, but turns out to be BBC Sherlock as a faun. (The Greek mythological kind, not the little spotted baby deer kind.) They're old school Holmesians, so the whole way BBC Sherlock fandom is unabashedly bringing in all the usual media tropes is hard for them to wrap their head around, but don't take this as me making excuses because I've asked to their (Facebook) faces why this is quantifiably different than Basil of Baker Street or Wishbone.
Dudes! There are plenty of fringes that aren't my cuppa (Mystrade? Really? They've never met onscreen!) but picking one to make a public example of and apologize "on behalf of fandom" for? Bad form. VERY bad form. And also? You don't speak for fandom as a whole.
This does not prelude my being at Gally and ChicagoTARDIS for the Doctor Who anniversary year, plus worshiping at the altar of Scott The First in Stratford. I *am* a fan, after all.
Speaking of fans, you may be aware that someone famous in comics has mansplained that cosplaying women at comic conventions are not "real" fans. I've seen scholarly takedowns and feminist takedowns, but Dork Towers does the best job of it in 15 panels. Do NOT fuck with costumers, dude; we know from experience just how much damage can be done to the human body with a rotary cutter.
And while I'm on the topic of self-appointed gateway keepers acting badly, the men behind I Hear of Sherlock Everywhere have put their foot in it by getting all "OMG, WTF?" over faunlock - which I had to go look up, but turns out to be BBC Sherlock as a faun. (The Greek mythological kind, not the little spotted baby deer kind.) They're old school Holmesians, so the whole way BBC Sherlock fandom is unabashedly bringing in all the usual media tropes is hard for them to wrap their head around, but don't take this as me making excuses because I've asked to their (Facebook) faces why this is quantifiably different than Basil of Baker Street or Wishbone.
Dudes! There are plenty of fringes that aren't my cuppa (Mystrade? Really? They've never met onscreen!) but picking one to make a public example of and apologize "on behalf of fandom" for? Bad form. VERY bad form. And also? You don't speak for fandom as a whole.
Another related comic
Date: 2012-12-06 04:13 am (UTC)Re: Another related comic
Date: 2012-12-07 12:36 am (UTC)Re: Another related comic
Date: 2012-12-07 11:53 pm (UTC)And the friends with me laughed and laughed and laughed. (That was while I was still in NM. So, at that point, my LARP experience had been 6 years in the Camarilla, one Nero weekend, a couple of years or so of another monthly fantasy LARP, various troupe games... and that's not getting into SCA-stuff, which is related.)
Re: Another related comic
Date: 2012-12-08 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-06 11:55 am (UTC)What with the what, now? o_O
I must say, for weirdness, that beats 'Spike and Buffy are a sweet couple living in the normal world' all to hell. ;)
(Fair disclosure: I hate fanfic where the characters are completely transformed into other things. HATEY HATE HATE. I read fanfic because I want more stories in my beloved universe. If I wanted to read about Fauns/Satyrs, I'd be reading Camp Half-Blood fanfic. But I am not the High Queen of Fandom - if I were, there'd be a lot more good Farscape fanfic - and one person's personal taste isn't the be-all and end-all. Clearly, there are lots of people who love that kind of thing, because there's fanfic written for them! :)
no subject
Date: 2012-12-07 12:47 am (UTC)Considering how many Sherlock AUs I've recced, I can't point and laugh too much when I hit one I don't like. But, y'know, I'm not asking them, or you, or anyone to *like* it or even not to snicker loudly or make heaving noises. It's that it was *held up for ridicule specifically* in a public forum that's beyond the pale for me.
More so because they don't know it, but they doubled down today by saying it was a girl in a faunlock costume that set them off. And dudes? Read the Dork Towers cartoon. Costuming is HARD WORK. Even if I don't respect the outcome, I have to respect the effort.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-06 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-07 12:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-06 05:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-07 12:53 am (UTC)The hell? I missed that, and am glad I did. Who can dislike the otters? The otter thing was genius - and *where* did Ben say that thing about the paws? That's BRILLIANT! The thing I love about fandom as a whole is its joyously batshit creativity.
I've lost a lot of respect for the I Hear of Sherlock people - moreso because a comment on facebook tells me that they said what they did over a cosplayer - a faunlock cosplayer. That, I take personally. Like the outcome or not, I have to respect the work.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-07 07:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-07 11:23 am (UTC)If one were being very uncharitable, one might suggest that this could be because Mr Cumberbatch's chin is hardly his most prominent feature, if indeed he has one.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-07 11:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-08 02:58 pm (UTC)Here's the internet you just won. Sorry, it's slightly sticky in places.
no subject
Date: 2012-12-08 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-08 01:56 am (UTC)http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images?_adv_prop=image&fr=goodsearch-yhsif&va=Sherlock+otter
no subject
Date: 2012-12-08 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-06 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-07 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-06 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-07 12:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-07 02:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-12-08 02:59 pm (UTC)