![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I could work up a good rant someday about how the First Amendment died when "under God" was added to the Pledge and "In God We Trust" replaced "E Pluribus Unum" on the money. If it didn't croak right there, it at least got a serious case of the flu; no, "God" does NOT mean generic deity!
A law signed in Mississippi today chisels away another piece. It's about the municipal budget for government building and supplies. Look down on page 35, lines 1149-1153. (Note: it's a .pdf.)
That, ladies and gentlemen, is called "establishment of religion" and it's not legal. It goes beyond generics to specify writings from one specific religious book and no others.
A law signed in Mississippi today chisels away another piece. It's about the municipal budget for government building and supplies. Look down on page 35, lines 1149-1153. (Note: it's a .pdf.)
That, ladies and gentlemen, is called "establishment of religion" and it's not legal. It goes beyond generics to specify writings from one specific religious book and no others.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 05:45 pm (UTC)(if not, we can probably arrange to cover the moving costs for someone...)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 05:47 pm (UTC)Too bad it's not Alabama. It's fun to watch
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 05:46 pm (UTC)But the Ten Commandments are just BASIC MORAL PRINCIPLES! They're NOT religion-specific! People say so in news interviews ALL THE TIME! It MUST be true!
Obviously it means the first one got repealed when I wasn't looking, of course...
< drippingcorrosivesarcasm >
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 06:03 pm (UTC)What about the Beatitudes? (Not that I'd mind seeing "Blessed are the peacemakers" hanging in the Oval Office right about now.)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 06:16 pm (UTC)Not that it matters, because even if they were general principles, expressing them in that particular recognizable form makes them specific to a religion. Even if they were NAMING the particular recognizable forms (and only them) in the legislation. Which just, please.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-22 06:16 pm (UTC)Considering
Date: 2005-04-22 08:36 pm (UTC)