Another woman-reader question
Oct. 6th, 2004 09:53 amY'all are going to end up hearing a lot about this book!
Check out these passages (all from the POV of a man watching his wife dress):
"...this big woman..."
"Big, and also overweight..."
"She dwarfed..."
"Her ever-increasing hips drooping..."
"...her ample self..."
"...big, overweight..."
"...the desire he'd felt ten years ago, when a not-so-expansive..."
Seven fat references in three pages. Only three pages! Actually, 2 1/2, as it's the beginning of a chapter (and yet another POV change). The fourth page has yet another dig - "Women not heavy with fat-laden stomachs and giant hips..."
I. Get. The. Point!
And furthermore, since the author has made it clear that we're talking about the rich, influential, and catty, I'm fully expecting to find out that this lardo is a whopping size 12.
Yes, we're supposed to be getting the idea this guy is losing interest in his wife. Yes, I'm overweight myself and probably oversensitive. But taken in conjunction with the author's already Cosmo-flavored prose, I can't help but consider this to be an unnecessary hammering of size, particularly egregious when it is written by a woman for other women to read. There are no two neurosis hammered harder into women than the notions that they aren't skinny enough and aren't good enough in bed. (Yeah, he starts complaining about *that*, too.)
Can someone name me some of the more class-conscious women's magazines? I so need to reference them in the review. Better Homes is too frumpy, and Vanity Fair actually has substance - I need a few names in the middle. People with pseudo-gravitas. Jane? Cosmopolitan? Rich Bitch Quarterly?
(I think I'm eventually going to start a contest - "name the RtE book review that was discussed in veiled terms on LJ, win a book!" But not necessarily that book, since it's the eye-sporking ones I always end up venting about.)
Check out these passages (all from the POV of a man watching his wife dress):
"...this big woman..."
"Big, and also overweight..."
"She dwarfed..."
"Her ever-increasing hips drooping..."
"...her ample self..."
"...big, overweight..."
"...the desire he'd felt ten years ago, when a not-so-expansive..."
Seven fat references in three pages. Only three pages! Actually, 2 1/2, as it's the beginning of a chapter (and yet another POV change). The fourth page has yet another dig - "Women not heavy with fat-laden stomachs and giant hips..."
I. Get. The. Point!
And furthermore, since the author has made it clear that we're talking about the rich, influential, and catty, I'm fully expecting to find out that this lardo is a whopping size 12.
Yes, we're supposed to be getting the idea this guy is losing interest in his wife. Yes, I'm overweight myself and probably oversensitive. But taken in conjunction with the author's already Cosmo-flavored prose, I can't help but consider this to be an unnecessary hammering of size, particularly egregious when it is written by a woman for other women to read. There are no two neurosis hammered harder into women than the notions that they aren't skinny enough and aren't good enough in bed. (Yeah, he starts complaining about *that*, too.)
Can someone name me some of the more class-conscious women's magazines? I so need to reference them in the review. Better Homes is too frumpy, and Vanity Fair actually has substance - I need a few names in the middle. People with pseudo-gravitas. Jane? Cosmopolitan? Rich Bitch Quarterly?
(I think I'm eventually going to start a contest - "name the RtE book review that was discussed in veiled terms on LJ, win a book!" But not necessarily that book, since it's the eye-sporking ones I always end up venting about.)