(no subject)
Aug. 19th, 2005 10:34 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I had a whole thing on Cindy Sheehan and what's been said about her going through my head, but I'm just going to point this out because in all the verbiage that's been slung around, I haven't seen anyone use these words yet:
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or
of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of grievances.
That is all.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or
of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of grievances.
That is all.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-19 02:39 pm (UTC)(goes off to do exactly that)
no subject
Date: 2005-08-19 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-19 02:46 pm (UTC)Cafe Press that, I SO want that on a T-shirt and mug!
no subject
Date: 2005-08-19 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-19 02:45 pm (UTC)Still, many of the neocons are also Strict Constructionalists, which means they want the Constitution to be adhered to exactly as written. So maybe we all need to remind them of exactly what WAS written.
PS - do you read
no subject
Date: 2005-08-19 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-19 05:12 pm (UTC)