*twitch*twitch*want*
Sep. 13th, 2005 02:22 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm ears-deep in Bouchercon books, the TBRs have overflowed their bookshelves (I wonder if I'm going to have to go back to counting 'em every month), and what do I do? Walk through Borders yesterday on the way to lunch.
No, I didn't buy any books. But that didn't stop me from checking out Great Gatsby (which I've never read and was heavily referenced in the book I just reviewed, of all things.) And what's right next to it? The Beautiful and Damned. Ooooo, shiney. And Rita Mae Brown has a new book out that I could pick up for reviewing purposes...
In the meantime, the Teaching Company, well aware that they've got a live one on the line, keep sending me flyers. Lookie - Classics of American Literature! On sale! That would make a nice bookend with Understanding Literature and Life, not that that alone won't take me a year to do.
The saner part of my mind keeps asking "Honey, you have GOT to decide if you actually want to read/reread some of this stuff." Because I can just go out and buy Gatsby if I keep obsessing on it... but I have *never* wanted to read Moby Dick or The Small House of Uncle Thomas. As far as I'm concerned, that knockoff of the Essex story cut out all the really interesting bits.
There's also the truth that I've already read a few of the required readings already: Complete Poe (8th grade); The Scarlet Letter (9th grade); Tom Sawyer (summer reading program); Invisible Man (11th grade); and that lit prof favorite, Huck Finn (5th grade, 8th grade, *and* college - a pattern matched only by Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, which was also required for 3 classes.)
No, I didn't buy any books. But that didn't stop me from checking out Great Gatsby (which I've never read and was heavily referenced in the book I just reviewed, of all things.) And what's right next to it? The Beautiful and Damned. Ooooo, shiney. And Rita Mae Brown has a new book out that I could pick up for reviewing purposes...
In the meantime, the Teaching Company, well aware that they've got a live one on the line, keep sending me flyers. Lookie - Classics of American Literature! On sale! That would make a nice bookend with Understanding Literature and Life, not that that alone won't take me a year to do.
The saner part of my mind keeps asking "Honey, you have GOT to decide if you actually want to read/reread some of this stuff." Because I can just go out and buy Gatsby if I keep obsessing on it... but I have *never* wanted to read Moby Dick or The Small House of Uncle Thomas. As far as I'm concerned, that knockoff of the Essex story cut out all the really interesting bits.
There's also the truth that I've already read a few of the required readings already: Complete Poe (8th grade); The Scarlet Letter (9th grade); Tom Sawyer (summer reading program); Invisible Man (11th grade); and that lit prof favorite, Huck Finn (5th grade, 8th grade, *and* college - a pattern matched only by Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, which was also required for 3 classes.)
no subject
Date: 2005-09-13 07:07 pm (UTC)On the other hand, I can see the value in having a reasonably-universal set of cultural references from which one can draw with some certainty of being understood by most readers. But why do these have to be from modern fiction, when most of the points they make are also widely available in ancient myth & fable?
In any event, I have concluded that the only reason I'll ever read a Dead White Men's Canon book again is if someone I know tells me that there's some reason to read it besides its being canon. Too many of the books on that list would never make it out of the slush pile if I were an editor.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-13 08:17 pm (UTC)Second, there's a reason why some books last for decades, if not centuries, and it's not simply because live white professors like to teach them. They still have something to say after all this time, even if it's sometimes dated. Sometimes it will never entirely date. The why of that fascinates me. For instance:
But why do these have to be from modern fiction, when most of the points they make are also widely available in ancient myth & fable?
Because Uncle Tom's Cabin, Huck Finn, and The Invisible Man (to pick three) all address not just archetypes, but specific historical and social points in the specific culture of my country. There's nothing in ancient myth and fable that talks about the specific abuses of one race upon another, how the priveleged race also began to question and rebell, and how the specific insults and injustices were continued underground all within the framework of my own country.
Are Whitman and Dickenson somehow lesser than Homer because they are historically younger?
(and in a side note, if they ever do a class on Austen I'm doomed. I won't even wait for it to go on sale.)
no subject
Date: 2005-09-13 11:38 pm (UTC)If I can reproduce it, I'll e-mail it to you.