Oh, bollocks!
Feb. 21st, 2007 07:34 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
There is a Newberry-winning book, The Higher Power of Lucky that is being banned from libraries because it has the word "scrotum" in it.
Nevermind that scrotum is the medically accurate term for something half the audience has, apparently knowing this will Scar The Children Forever. (Much like answering a nine year old girl's question "A vagina is the thing between your legs" was too much for a woman who demanded that the title "Vagina Monologues" be changed since her niece asked what it meant.)
"The inclusion of genitalia does not add to the story one bit and that is my objection," said Dana Nilsson, a teacher and librarian from Durango, Colorado. "Because of that one word, I would not be able to read that book aloud...you won't find men's genitalia in quality literature ... At least not for children."
Neil Gaiman, bless his cotton socksand brass equipment has posted a whole list of children's books that mention scrotums. (He's left out My Friend Flicka, one of my own favorites, which has a graphic scene of colt castration, including explanation of what a "risling" was.)
And on a side note, Josh Steichmann's excellent editorial on the subject. [T]he idea that children have to be protected from all sex and discussions thereof is more emblematic of a repressed adult mind than any real risk, and the ways lines are drawn are nearly always insulting.
Nevermind that scrotum is the medically accurate term for something half the audience has, apparently knowing this will Scar The Children Forever. (Much like answering a nine year old girl's question "A vagina is the thing between your legs" was too much for a woman who demanded that the title "Vagina Monologues" be changed since her niece asked what it meant.)
"The inclusion of genitalia does not add to the story one bit and that is my objection," said Dana Nilsson, a teacher and librarian from Durango, Colorado. "Because of that one word, I would not be able to read that book aloud...you won't find men's genitalia in quality literature ... At least not for children."
Neil Gaiman, bless his cotton socks
And on a side note, Josh Steichmann's excellent editorial on the subject. [T]he idea that children have to be protected from all sex and discussions thereof is more emblematic of a repressed adult mind than any real risk, and the ways lines are drawn are nearly always insulting.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-21 01:15 pm (UTC)Scrotum.
Vagina.
Penis.
Clitoris.
etc.
Ban all the medical books!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-21 06:00 pm (UTC)Children must under no circumstances be allowed near dictionaries or encyclopedias!
;-)
no subject
Date: 2007-02-21 02:05 pm (UTC)Overcensorship is stupid, I'll grant that, but it makes me laugh because it's so self-defeating.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-21 03:53 pm (UTC)This is one reason why I would not want to work in a school library. (And it is almost universally the school libraries that are freaking, not public.) Having to put up with easily panicked school boards and parents can be a terrible thing. If they'd only use their brains.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-22 09:32 am (UTC)was so disgusted that I determined on the spot that my children will not
use STUPID words for perfectly normal things .
no subject
Date: 2007-02-22 06:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-22 07:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-22 07:57 pm (UTC)