Quickie Dear Author
Sep. 17th, 2007 11:14 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A comment and a postcard message.
The anti-rennfaire author I wrote about three letters back? One of the ways she dissed rennies was to have members of the culture make fun of other members of the culture a la "and she makes soap! Soap! All that messing about with pots and crap and do you know what soap sells for at the grocery store? What a waste of time and money!" I was thinking about that today because it's going to be really interesting if that author ever smacks into Tim Myers or Cricket McRae at a cozy con. I'm just sayin'.
2) Postcard to All Suspense Authors, Ever:
Please stop ending your first chapter with anything along the lines of "things were about to get crazy" or "if I knew then what I was getting into," or "that was just the beginning." Dude! It's the first damn chapter! We already KNOW there's going to be more to the story! Either we've already bailed or we're already going to read Chapter 2. You don't have to put a blatant hook there. Really.
Signed,
I just read four books in a row like that and it's started to give me hives.
The anti-rennfaire author I wrote about three letters back? One of the ways she dissed rennies was to have members of the culture make fun of other members of the culture a la "and she makes soap! Soap! All that messing about with pots and crap and do you know what soap sells for at the grocery store? What a waste of time and money!" I was thinking about that today because it's going to be really interesting if that author ever smacks into Tim Myers or Cricket McRae at a cozy con. I'm just sayin'.
2) Postcard to All Suspense Authors, Ever:
Please stop ending your first chapter with anything along the lines of "things were about to get crazy" or "if I knew then what I was getting into," or "that was just the beginning." Dude! It's the first damn chapter! We already KNOW there's going to be more to the story! Either we've already bailed or we're already going to read Chapter 2. You don't have to put a blatant hook there. Really.
Signed,
I just read four books in a row like that and it's started to give me hives.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 04:19 pm (UTC)So totally agree. On both counts.
(At one point I told my mom I was teaching myself how to knit socks. Her reaction was along the lines of "but why, when they're so cheap to buy in the store?!" ...thereby totally missing the point. It's not that I need socks; it's that I want the process.)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 02:59 pm (UTC)that truly disgusts me.
Yeah, soap is cheap. In the store.
Unless of course, you're going to, say, Crabtree & Evelyn.
Oh, yeah - making specialized soaps is SUCH a waste that
there's WHOLE CHAINS devoted to selling them....
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 04:06 pm (UTC)There've been a few times where a non-knitter asked me point blank how much the sock yarn cost me, but I've always countered that I'm paying that much for a month or two of entertainment and just having a nice pair of socks at the end as a bonus.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 04:53 pm (UTC)I'm totally stealing that explanation! (And it makes the price a lot more palatable, too.)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-20 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-26 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 04:31 pm (UTC)I really, really hope RtE runs my review. Really.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 04:13 pm (UTC)And gah! Definitely a lot of contempt for the whole idea of DIY and personal creativity -- which doesn't say a lot of good about how the author views her own craft of writing, unless she's got some sort of conceptual divide going. Like, DIY is great if it's remodeling your house, and creativity is respectable if you're getting paid for it -- but if you have non-mainstream hobbies you're a shameful weirdo and probably a serious loser.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 04:54 pm (UTC)Quite probably. I get the impression, based on nothing, that someone else suggested that she set her next story at a fair and this is her way of lashing back.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 05:06 pm (UTC)2. Don't these people have editors? (said the editor.)
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 05:54 pm (UTC)What the hell is wrong with people?
I don't know if the author was scoring off a personal beef or was asked to write in a setting she didn't like, but the scorn just dripped off the page. Unrelentingly. From every single character. And without any flicker of understanding that the people she didn't like were the very ones who were going to be reading the book!
Congrats, honey, you rocketed to the top of my "won't have in the house" list. I have a feeling that is not what she intended.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 06:32 pm (UTC)So at least something good came out of the anti-rennfaire author's efforts!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 07:45 pm (UTC)Although I'm biased and still think Parrots is the best.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 04:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 06:59 pm (UTC)Don't TELL me I'm supposed to be anxious due to the suspense. MAKE me anxious.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 07:47 pm (UTC)On the other hand, I think I found another reason why. So many books have the first chapter of the next one bound into them, so the hook isn't to keep people reading when they actually have the book, it's to make them buy it!
...still think it should be removed at publication, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 08:49 pm (UTC)I love me some Reichs, but seriously!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 10:44 pm (UTC)*snicker* I'm a newcomer to Reichs, so I don't know all her cliches yet.
Hey, off topic - have you gotten an email from the soniclipstick gmail address? Nobody's answered, and I was going to use that to set up the newsletter rounds. I'm thinking Monday-Wednesday-Friday pub schedule, with a free-floater over the weekend so Monday's nl isn't outrageous.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-18 09:53 am (UTC)*flail*
no subject
Date: 2007-09-17 11:31 pm (UTC)Wallbang.
Wallbang!
WALLBANG!