Rome - the camera geek edition
Oct. 8th, 2007 09:55 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The new digital camera I bought was an Olympus FE-210. It ate a fair number of batteries, but that appears to have been a combination of my taking old batteries and the fact that it punks out when it heats up - and it heats up quickly if you leave it on, even if it's put to "sleep."
After eating my entire vacation's worth of packed batteries in Pompeii (a combination of heat and age, I think), my brother gave me a pair of the lithium AAs, and those stood me in good stead for several days, taking over 200 pictures, even when hot. Then with fresh regular AAs (and a cool camera) it lasted another day and a half. Definately happier with the lithiums.
Anyway, aside from that, and my inability to set the #@(@)*! date and time so it wouldn't nag me every single time I turned it on!, it was a very good camera. Seriously, a very good one... that like cars that take premium gas, wants to have the premium batteries.
First of all, it was amazingly sensitive to light - IF you turned off the flash. Here are two pictures of the door to the Pantheon.
This is with the flash, at twilight:

This, taken a second later, was with the flash turned off.

And this, boys and girls, is why I had the flash off for most of the trip. It made the pictures brighter!
Then there was the zoom feature. This is a mosaic that John Paul had installed when he was shot - he credits Mary for his survival, and she is looking at the place where he was shot.

This? Is where I was standing at the time. Look for the hand upper rightish for where the mosaic is.

By the way, the icon was made of a picture snapped in the Vatican's map room.
After eating my entire vacation's worth of packed batteries in Pompeii (a combination of heat and age, I think), my brother gave me a pair of the lithium AAs, and those stood me in good stead for several days, taking over 200 pictures, even when hot. Then with fresh regular AAs (and a cool camera) it lasted another day and a half. Definately happier with the lithiums.
Anyway, aside from that, and my inability to set the #@(@)*! date and time so it wouldn't nag me every single time I turned it on!, it was a very good camera. Seriously, a very good one... that like cars that take premium gas, wants to have the premium batteries.
First of all, it was amazingly sensitive to light - IF you turned off the flash. Here are two pictures of the door to the Pantheon.
This is with the flash, at twilight:
This, taken a second later, was with the flash turned off.
And this, boys and girls, is why I had the flash off for most of the trip. It made the pictures brighter!
Then there was the zoom feature. This is a mosaic that John Paul had installed when he was shot - he credits Mary for his survival, and she is looking at the place where he was shot.
This? Is where I was standing at the time. Look for the hand upper rightish for where the mosaic is.
By the way, the icon was made of a picture snapped in the Vatican's map room.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 02:49 am (UTC)The map room! Isn't it incredible? I could've spent days in there.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 10:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:27 am (UTC)So far, sounds like a great trip.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 08:10 pm (UTC)And after my previous camera broke, whenever I turned it on I had to set the date and time every damned time I was about to use it, before I could actually take a picture. (Well, not had to, but I really prefer to have the "date taken" be accurate for sorting purposes.)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:23 pm (UTC)But then, with all the battery swapping, nothing was set in stone.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 04:54 pm (UTC)Will definitely have to keep this in mind when I finally break down and get a digital camera myself...
WOW...
no subject
Date: 2007-10-09 11:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-14 04:51 pm (UTC)And it sounds like your trip was a blast!