A quick poll (mtgat, please vote!)

[neadods]

I'm struggling surprisingly with the Firefox News writeup for Silence in the Library/Forest of the Dead. I've been doing them like book reviews - no spoilers, just a setup and general reaction. I ask y'all, as you are my most likely bunch of readers who'll respond, what would you prefer? To continue book-style, or to do a full beginning-to-end recap with added snark, squee, and meta? Recap style gives me more leeway, and also would allow me to do the first half of multi-part episodes in their own post.

[Poll #1216738]

Comments

[mtgat]

Dood, snark, squee and meta are the meat and veg of the site. ;)

[neadods.livejournal.com]

The reason I was waiting to do the two together was because book-style you can't really comment on half of it.

The downside is that doing the recap style will take longer (i.e., I'm not going to have a chance to rewatch and snark until I've gotten the finale out of my system come back from my parent's on Sunday.

[jetpack-monkey.livejournal.com]

When I'm going in-depth on a horror film review, I tend to open book-style and then segue (fairly clearly) into a more detailed description later in the review. Not a strict recap, but more of a "didja see this omg?" thing.

[drho.livejournal.com]

I like the way you've done them, but recaps would also be interesting.

[lukadreaming.livejournal.com]

Yay for snark, squee and meta *g*.

[iko.livejournal.com]

I think that added snark, squee, and meta would be lots of fun to read.

[astitchintime-9.livejournal.com]

If "Recap style" is more like TWoP's style than "Book style" is, then "Recap" is the style that I'll appreciate reading the most!

FWIW.

[neadods.livejournal.com]

I have issues with TWOP, but yes, that's the general idea.