![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The great thing about fandom in the Internet Age is that vicariously experiencing things is getting more and more real-time. And more and more outright real!
thefannishwaldo liveblogged the Julie Gardener - Stephen Moffat panel (small spoilers for Christmas special at end). There'll be a separate post for the Torchwood panel at some point. So far all she's posted is that there was a "marry, shag, or cliff" game with John, Julie, and Gareth, and Naoko (in which Naoko volunteered to be cliffed - John said he'd shag her first - he'd then shag Julie, but he'd marry Gareth "because I've seen him naked.")
And I don't know who grabbed the minute-long clip of John Barrowman and Naoko Mori singing Miss Saigon with Gareth in the middle.
The OG links to three interviews with Stephen Moffat from Comic Con
In Hamlet news, I'm more than a little appalled that the Tennant website has had to post basic theater etiquette - and I mean REALLY basic stuff, like "don't disturb the actors or the rest of the audience." *facepalm* The RSC/actors (who started it I'm not sure) have also put out a huge set of warnings that they will only sign stuff about Hamlet, not Star Trek or Doctor Who memorabilia. That makes sense enough. However, I'm sure it's the RSC that has added the rider that it must be materials from the RSC shop which does piss me off. For those of us who *have* theater diaries and/or favorite script copies, it seems frankly petty.
Not that anyone could necessarily tell in a glance say, an Arden that came from the RSC vs the Borders downtown DC anyway.
(I have a copy of the Arden complete that has served as notes and theater diary ever since I started going to Stratford Ont. & ushering at the DC Shakes; I've been writing down the dates/locations of the productions and (in the script itself) details of the particularly notable bits of business.)
PS - and since this is suddenly turning into the overarching Who post of the day, the Sun will just print anything they wank onto a page, won't they? The latest article is so full of facepalm fail I don't even know which loose end to start yanking to unravel it. Poor Freema, is she always going to end up being the whipping girl of the Whoniverse? (There was even Yet Another Ugly Rumor about the poor woman at Shore Leave, which was quickly and tidily shot down.)
It's going to be frickin' hilarious in retrospect if she's in both Torchwood and Law and Order: London, as is easily likely considering England's short show seasons. Far more likely than an experienced, professional showrunner somehow assuming that a working actress would turn down work in the hopes of some sort of last-minute "oops, we wrote huge scenes for you but forgot to actually sign you up" contract.
Truly, there is not enough eyeroll in the world.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
And I don't know who grabbed the minute-long clip of John Barrowman and Naoko Mori singing Miss Saigon with Gareth in the middle.
The OG links to three interviews with Stephen Moffat from Comic Con
In Hamlet news, I'm more than a little appalled that the Tennant website has had to post basic theater etiquette - and I mean REALLY basic stuff, like "don't disturb the actors or the rest of the audience." *facepalm* The RSC/actors (who started it I'm not sure) have also put out a huge set of warnings that they will only sign stuff about Hamlet, not Star Trek or Doctor Who memorabilia. That makes sense enough. However, I'm sure it's the RSC that has added the rider that it must be materials from the RSC shop which does piss me off. For those of us who *have* theater diaries and/or favorite script copies, it seems frankly petty.
Not that anyone could necessarily tell in a glance say, an Arden that came from the RSC vs the Borders downtown DC anyway.
(I have a copy of the Arden complete that has served as notes and theater diary ever since I started going to Stratford Ont. & ushering at the DC Shakes; I've been writing down the dates/locations of the productions and (in the script itself) details of the particularly notable bits of business.)
PS - and since this is suddenly turning into the overarching Who post of the day, the Sun will just print anything they wank onto a page, won't they? The latest article is so full of facepalm fail I don't even know which loose end to start yanking to unravel it. Poor Freema, is she always going to end up being the whipping girl of the Whoniverse? (There was even Yet Another Ugly Rumor about the poor woman at Shore Leave, which was quickly and tidily shot down.)
It's going to be frickin' hilarious in retrospect if she's in both Torchwood and Law and Order: London, as is easily likely considering England's short show seasons. Far more likely than an experienced, professional showrunner somehow assuming that a working actress would turn down work in the hopes of some sort of last-minute "oops, we wrote huge scenes for you but forgot to actually sign you up" contract.
Truly, there is not enough eyeroll in the world.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 11:18 am (UTC)And why do so many people hate her so fucking much? :(
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 11:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 11:22 am (UTC)I'm REALLY trying to believe that this is not related to certain people's dislike of certain skin tones. :(
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 11:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 02:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 06:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 06:33 pm (UTC)Never, ever, ever ever ever ever. And given that they're sinking this low when three of the four recent parts she's been offered (Little Dorrit, Survivors, Torchwood, L&O London) AREN'T WHO-RELATED, I think we can at last retire the genteel fiction that "it's not Freema I dislike, it's Martha!"
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 07:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 04:00 pm (UTC)Of all the nasty rumors, that's the one that really knots my knickers. Fired != sent to other flagship shows for another airing nor brought back for close to half the next season. That has to be the most special (and lucrative) definition of "fired" I've ever heard of in my life.
Fired="don't let the door hit your ass on the way out," as the girl who played Kelsea can doubtless tell anyone.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 08:52 pm (UTC)(However, I do think that a certain contingent did cut Donna much more slack because she wasn't a romantic rival for Rose and did, to some degree, yenta.)
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 09:01 pm (UTC)However, a considerable percentage of Freema-haters probably = Ten/Rose batchippers, and a considerable percentage of Ten/Rose batchippers probably = fangirls with some racial issues, which was the point I was trying to make.
I'm REALLY not looking forward to seeing how Yasmin Paige's replacement on SJA is treated by fandom. As much as I love love LOVE Maria (and her dad,
who serves as my proxy in my fantasies of fucking Sarah Jane), as long as she's given a respectful send-off (DO NOT WANT ALAN AND CHRISSIE GETTING BACK TOGETHER), then I won't hold it against the new girl, and I hope that other fans will be similarly charitable.And yet, I swear, I can already hear the racial epithets being hurled her way ... :(
no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 10:41 pm (UTC)But Chrissie Jackson? Jesus Christ, I think I'd rather let kids be raised by crack addicts, pedophiles or Dina Lohan than that woman. She and Sylvia Noble are neck-and-neck for the title of Worst Parent in the Whoniverse, and at least Sylvia has the advantage of receiving a Dire Fucking Warning from the Doctor to be a better parent. If Chrissie was my mom, I think I'd rather hear the sounds of gunshots coming from my own bedroom than to hear her voice.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 04:07 pm (UTC)I don't think we'll get a marital reconciliation. I'm hoping that Alan takes a job away from home. We already know that he has a software business, which translates quite nicely to any other big city, or even to America.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 04:10 pm (UTC)My call on the coverstory is that Alan's software company is going to require him to move; they already suggested as much in the Who finale.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-27 03:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-25 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-26 04:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From: