Huzzah for Judge Land!
Sep. 17th, 2009 08:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
neadodsWho knew that legal proceedings could be so entertaining to read? If you poke around my talibangelical/women's rights tags you'll find the smackdown given to Noel "I don't have to do anything in my job that might make me even hear the words birth control" Noeson, and if you poke around the ID tag, you'll find the Dover "Dude, Intelligent Design is too Creationism" Decision.
And now, Judge Land of the Middle District Court of Georgia has handed Orly Taitz her ass on a legal platter. (pdf warning)
Long story short, Orly Taitz has been treating the legal system like a slot machine, dropping in lots of little lawsuits in the hopes of someday winning the jackpot of a judge who agrees that Obama is not a natural-born citizen and thus not legally President. A particular favorite is filing on behalf of soldiers who claim they can't be sent to Iraq because President Barack Obama is not constitutionally eligible to act as Commander in Chief of the United States armed forces. [p1]
The spanking Captain Connie Rhodes and Ms Taitz get is GLORIOUS, starting with the Court finds that Plaintiff’s claims are frivolous... Furthermore, Plaintiff’s counsel is hereby notified that the filing of any future actions in this Court, which are similarly frivolous, shall subject counsel to sanctions. [p1]
How frivolous was it? First of all, Judge Land notes that she has already lost this case once, only to have Taitz go ahead and refile it in a different jurisdiction [p2] and that the argument that Rhodes would happily obey any order *except* deploying to Iraq, or she would deploy to a war zone if only GW Bush was still President are completely unconvincing arguments of "irreparable harm."
In the meantime, Taitz and Rhodes claimed, in court, that the evidence against Obama included Obama:
- not being in the country legally, much less being a citizen [p7]
- "might" have used multiple addresses, names, and social security numbers [p8]
- that the infamous Hawaiian short form birth certificate should be presumed fraudulent. [p8]
- being considered a fraud in the general opinion in the rest of the world [p8]
and my personal favorite:
according to an “AOL poll 85% of Americans believe that Obama was not vetted, needs to be vetted and his vital records need to be produced.” [p8]
My favorite of the whole thing is on page 9, though: Plaintiff’s complaint is not plausible on its face. To the extent that it alleges any “facts,” the Complaint does not connect those facts to any actual violation of Plaintiff’s individual constitutional rights. Unlike in Alice in Wonderland, simply saying something is so does not make it so.
Glorious stuff! Do go read it all.
Rhodes has asked the judge to reconsider. Taitz's response was to say that the judge should be tried for treason (and compare her trials and tribulations to Nelson Mandela's).
And now, Judge Land of the Middle District Court of Georgia has handed Orly Taitz her ass on a legal platter. (pdf warning)
Long story short, Orly Taitz has been treating the legal system like a slot machine, dropping in lots of little lawsuits in the hopes of someday winning the jackpot of a judge who agrees that Obama is not a natural-born citizen and thus not legally President. A particular favorite is filing on behalf of soldiers who claim they can't be sent to Iraq because President Barack Obama is not constitutionally eligible to act as Commander in Chief of the United States armed forces. [p1]
The spanking Captain Connie Rhodes and Ms Taitz get is GLORIOUS, starting with the Court finds that Plaintiff’s claims are frivolous... Furthermore, Plaintiff’s counsel is hereby notified that the filing of any future actions in this Court, which are similarly frivolous, shall subject counsel to sanctions. [p1]
How frivolous was it? First of all, Judge Land notes that she has already lost this case once, only to have Taitz go ahead and refile it in a different jurisdiction [p2] and that the argument that Rhodes would happily obey any order *except* deploying to Iraq, or she would deploy to a war zone if only GW Bush was still President are completely unconvincing arguments of "irreparable harm."
In the meantime, Taitz and Rhodes claimed, in court, that the evidence against Obama included Obama:
- not being in the country legally, much less being a citizen [p7]
- "might" have used multiple addresses, names, and social security numbers [p8]
- that the infamous Hawaiian short form birth certificate should be presumed fraudulent. [p8]
- being considered a fraud in the general opinion in the rest of the world [p8]
and my personal favorite:
according to an “AOL poll 85% of Americans believe that Obama was not vetted, needs to be vetted and his vital records need to be produced.” [p8]
My favorite of the whole thing is on page 9, though: Plaintiff’s complaint is not plausible on its face. To the extent that it alleges any “facts,” the Complaint does not connect those facts to any actual violation of Plaintiff’s individual constitutional rights. Unlike in Alice in Wonderland, simply saying something is so does not make it so.
Glorious stuff! Do go read it all.
Rhodes has asked the judge to reconsider. Taitz's response was to say that the judge should be tried for treason (and compare her trials and tribulations to Nelson Mandela's).
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-09-18 03:50 pm (UTC)