Dear Author Part II (The Party Game)

[neadods]

Top posting rather than putting it in comments over and over... (See previous post for context)

Yes, The Merry Misogynist might be an accurate description of the book's contents. But is that necessarily a good thing? Because I was thinking last night about descriptive titles and what some of the books I've reviewed might have been called if the title is a description, no matter how blunt, of the contents/villain/attitude:

I Miss the 60s Before Feminism Ruined Everything

Femjep-o-rama!

All Women Are Castrating, Lying Bitches

She's Cute, But She Needs the Right Man to Save Her (a comedy)

Revenge of Femjep-o-rama

I Heart Torture Porn

I Only Added The Murder For Marketing Purposes; Don't Worry, It's Mostly a Quirky Romance

Lydia Bennett Is My Greatest Inspiration

Femjep-o-rama Returns

Ripping Off Famous Classical Authors 101 (102, 103...)

Why Do All The Reviewers Call My Heroine "Mary Sue?" It's Not Her Name!

Sex Sells, Plot Doesn't: Suck It Up and Stop Looking for Logic Cos You're Only Gonna Get Lube

The Series Didn't Sell, So I'm Wrapping Everything Up Now The Contract's Ending

I Might Have Signed the Contract, But I'm Bored to Tears With This Series So Don't Expect Me To Put Effort Into It

Bride of the Son of Femjep-o-rama


...I'm sure you can add more in comments

Comments

[neadods.livejournal.com]

It already is a movie; "Heroine needs mansplainin' to discover confidence or talent" has been used way, way, waaaaaaaaay too often already. (I was thinking of the Solomon's Law books, esp. the first one, but it equally fits Becoming Jane, Twilight, and on and on ad nauseum. Emphasis on nauseum.)