![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
If ever I needed proof that McCain's little red trolley has run off the tracks, it's his nomination of Palin for Veep.
Apparently convinced that all Clinton supporters will vote for anything with boobs, he has decided to woo liberal feminist Democrats away from the party by nominating an anti-choice, anti-gay rights, anti-environment, anti-science woman. Basically, a woman who stands against anything Clinton stands for.
Having shot himself in the foot with the Clinton supporters, he's put a bullet in the other foot by bringing a woman into the party that has already had some horrifically sexist things to say about women in politics and who has a fraction of the political experience of Obama... which is already too little for McCain.
And just to ice the cake - he's restoring dignity to office by nominating someone about to come under investigation.
Way to go, McCain.
On the other hand, I'm pretty sure I woke up in an alternate reality. Pat Buchanan raving with praise for Obama? A female VP nomination from the Republicans?
Apparently convinced that all Clinton supporters will vote for anything with boobs, he has decided to woo liberal feminist Democrats away from the party by nominating an anti-choice, anti-gay rights, anti-environment, anti-science woman. Basically, a woman who stands against anything Clinton stands for.
Having shot himself in the foot with the Clinton supporters, he's put a bullet in the other foot by bringing a woman into the party that has already had some horrifically sexist things to say about women in politics and who has a fraction of the political experience of Obama... which is already too little for McCain.
And just to ice the cake - he's restoring dignity to office by nominating someone about to come under investigation.
Way to go, McCain.
On the other hand, I'm pretty sure I woke up in an alternate reality. Pat Buchanan raving with praise for Obama? A female VP nomination from the Republicans?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 12:20 am (UTC)I agree though that the political manipulators in both party think that women will simply vote for any woman - not anything else that might affect them like work, schools, children. It's a very simplistic way of slotting people into nameless votes and sticking them in the slots.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 02:06 am (UTC)It also doesn't fill me with confidence that McCain and Paldin met, thrice, tops, before he picked her as a VP. If you leave your VP pick to your advisors, what the hell else are you leaving to your advisors?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 11:55 am (UTC)Apparently you leave your economic advice to them or don't have any at all, between his former-but-still-in-contact econ guy calling Americans "a bunch of whiners" while McCain himself doesn't know how many houses he owns. That's a real good way to be in touch with the heartland, where bills are always tight and businesses are failing.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 02:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 11:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 03:05 am (UTC)But, yeah, if he's thinking that she'll appeal to Clinton women... he needs a new set of advisors ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 11:59 am (UTC)And indeed, it looks like the evangelicals are suddenly much happier with him... but they are not, as they like to think, American kingmakers. Especially after the disaster of the last king crowned by them.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 06:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 12:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 08:07 pm (UTC)Or, more to the point, as a parody of RPF, which it was kind of intended to be.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 08:23 am (UTC)OMG, I seem to have managed to totally miss this. All I can find from Google is stuff dating back to the Jeremiah Wright business. Is there a link anywhere?
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 11:42 am (UTC)The gobsmacked looks on his co-anchor's faces is priceless.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 01:06 pm (UTC)I am now on the look out for signs of the apocalypse ...
no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-08-30 02:48 pm (UTC)*Ducks and runs*
no subject
Date: 2008-08-31 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-01 05:44 am (UTC)percentage of Hillary voters who have "sworn" to vote for
McCain. Now I'm sure that 90-whatever percentage of them
are actually just grousing in a huge way, & will not actually
vote for McCain, but McCain is obviously hopeful that they
will. Palin's "18,000,000 cracks in the glass ceiling" remark
is so blatant a reference as to be unmistakable.